From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 390baecca177eaa4a530b6b505b2a0b09491701df9e9da31bdb30d80cef0e5b2
Message ID: <m0txN0U-00094xC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-15 04:10:21 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 12:10:21 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 12:10:21 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:LACC: PC Phones Home?
Message-ID: <m0txN0U-00094xC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 07:41 PM 3/13/96 -0800, Jim McCoy wrote:
>Dennis Hilliard writes:
>>
>>"Software to the rescue:
>>If somoeone steals your PC, you may be able to get it back because of
>>software that acts as a kind of tracking device. Home Office Computing
>>magazine reports that the software CompuTrace TRS will automatically dial
>>the office of its creator, Absolute Software, if a thief hooks up a stolen
>>PC's modem to a phone line. The software reveals the location of the PC and
>>Absolute Software will call the police" - Providence Journal-Bulletin -
>>March 12, 1996.
>1- How does the PC know where it is?
>2- How does the PC know it has been stolen?
>
>Since this is a software product I am assuming that the answer to #1
>is the use of CallerID on the line when the software calls, which is
>defeated by the use of line blocking by the thief.
I think that 1-800 services provide caller ID information to the company or
organization that pays for the service. Whether or not this is blocked by
standard caller-ID I don't know. Nevertheless, like you, I am not
impressed with the likelihood of success of this system.
> The obvious answer
>to #2 seems to me to have the system call the CompuTrace office at
>odd intervals to see if it has been reported stolen yet...
One thing that might be useful would be a OTP (one-time programmable) EPROM
chip installed on all major system components (monitor, HD, motherboard,
CDROM drive, maybe even DRAM SIMMs). It would be a serial device for low
cost, such as a 3-pin TO-92 chip, which would have a capacity of about 4k
bits, enough to store a hash of the owner-history (at about 100 bits per
owner) for any owner that decided to leave a record. Like an EPROM, bits
could only be written once; the chip itself would prevent write-overs
previous to the last-written bit.
Subsequent owners could read the history and publish the hash codes; anyone
looking for such a stolen product could have their losses checked
automatically, and perhaps semi-anonymously or anonymously, by a service set
up to do this. Innocent owners could be adequately compensated for finding
a piece of stolen hardware, to the extent that nobody is deterred about
reporting a find.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to March 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-03-15 (Fri, 15 Mar 1996 12:10:21 +0800) - Re:LACC: PC Phones Home? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>