From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Robert Hettinga <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ec21fdc5baca2ddad3cd8e528420b5a2605ab5515ef15879ba8608f19326e804
Message ID: <199610180039.RAA01438@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-18 00:39:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 17:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 17:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: Robert Hettinga <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: EC patent
Message-ID: <199610180039.RAA01438@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 04:53 PM 10/17/96 -0400, Robert Hettinga wrote:
>--- begin forwarded text
>Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 14:03:34 +0800
>From: James Lee <jlee@ccl.itri.org.tw>
>Reply-To: jlee@ccl.itri.org.tw
>+----------------------------------------------------+
>Addressed to: set-discuss@commerce.net
>+----------------------------------------------------+
>
>I heard that CitiBank has filed for a patent in Japan with 140+ claims
>covering many aspects of electronic commerce, security electronic
>transaction, etc. Does anyone know more about it? What impact will it
>bring to all SET members?
>James Lee
>--- end forwarded text
Maybe Japanese law is different, but don't I recall reading somewhere that
"methods of doing business," business practices in general, are not
patentable?
Not that it would surprise me if the Patent Office idiots were to change
their minds, like they did concerning software, algorithms, and mathematics
in general...
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to October 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-10-18 (Thu, 17 Oct 1996 17:39:45 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: EC patent - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>