1996-05-25 - Re: PILATE SAYETH UNTO HIM…

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Sandy Sandfort <ravage@ssz.com>
Message Hash: fdde4225ad811e44efb8e74b64c221e19c9893c76fa6be24aae150efc6177751
Message ID: <199605241813.LAA07195@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-25 02:31:58 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 10:31:58 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 10:31:58 +0800
To: Sandy Sandfort <ravage@ssz.com>
Subject: Re: PILATE SAYETH UNTO HIM...
Message-ID: <199605241813.LAA07195@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 07:43 AM 5/24/96 -0700, Sandy Sandfort wrote:

>On Fri, 24 May 1996, Jim Choate wrote:
>
>> Sorry but the very fact that I don't agree with you is proof enough that
>> there is no absolute 'Truth' as you use it. 
>
>It isn't obvious that we DON"T agree.  It was still a question.
>Actually, I rather fancied Bell and May's responses.

I just dragged out my copy of a book titled "A Bodyguard of Lies," by 
Anthony Cave Brown.  It's a book on the various deception strategems used 
against the Germans in the latter part of WWII.    This deception plan was 
given the code-name, "Bodyguard", because Churchill had said in Tehran that 
"In war-time, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a 
bodyguard of lies."


Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com





Thread