From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Roger Williams <roger@coelacanth.com>
Message Hash: ff42962f769a953dc3acb1ecc6f82ec93c5020e4be4d41b693b4c9c093f45dca
Message ID: <199607140450.VAA17305@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-14 09:32:42 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 17:32:42 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 17:32:42 +0800
To: Roger Williams <roger@coelacanth.com>
Subject: Re: Can't block caller ID in Massachusetts?
Message-ID: <199607140450.VAA17305@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 10:25 PM 7/13/96 -0500, Roger Williams wrote:
>Certainly, though, if I was calling the BATF toll-free to rat on my
>neighbourhood Uzi dealer, I'd never call from my own phone, anonymous
>re-phoner or not.
A question to ponder: If (anonymous) pay telephones didn't already exist,
would they be allowed today?
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to July 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-07-14 (Sun, 14 Jul 1996 17:32:42 +0800) - Re: Can’t block caller ID in Massachusetts? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>