From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
Message Hash: 808b0ae6a7625bd62dd9b634e9d207d89db7a8c1b33a1857e819f5b8502707ca
Message ID: <m0tmz8s-00091XC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-15 14:40:42 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 22:40:42 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 22:40:42 +0800
To: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
Subject: Re: fortune and predictions...
Message-ID: <m0tmz8s-00091XC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 08:55 PM 2/14/96 -0500, Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada)
wrote:
>GREETINGS!
>
>>(BTW, why don't you respond to the list?)
>
>Actually, I just did. I was tempted to mail the stuff directly to you but
then,
>I realised that you might have interpreted what I said as a threat.
Huh? I didn't even notice. Well, I guess after a few months of promoting
"Assassination Politics", I'm so thick-skinned that nothing fazes me anymore.
>So I posted it
>publicly. (Isn't CPunks about being untrustfull... :)
The reason I'd prefer most of the discussion on the list is simple: I have
a limited amount of time, and I'm promoting an idea. If you have a good
argument that I should be able to address, I want everyone to have the
benefit not only of your comment but also my response!
>I brought an argument in my post. I could develop it further on private
e-mail with you.
I'll read it. However, my mail has slowed to a trickle today. There's
something wrong, somewhere. It'll come flooding in, in a few hours I'll bet.
>You will certainly understand my argument. I'd be delighted if you can
prove me wrong.
We shall see...
Return to February 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-02-15 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 22:40:42 +0800) - Re: fortune and predictions… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>