1995-12-21 - Re: Microsoft Flame[tm] [NOISE]

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: RobL <robl@on-ramp.ior.com>
Message Hash: ad1de59b22945d216825789240fcefc1e4d2ea55b58a8dd16d252186e5551906
Message ID: <m0tSpkY-0008ynC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-21 18:52:58 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Dec 95 10:52:58 PST

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 95 10:52:58 PST
To: RobL <robl@on-ramp.ior.com>
Subject: Re: Microsoft Flame[tm] [NOISE]
Message-ID: <m0tSpkY-0008ynC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


 Forget about the monopoly aspects for a second and look
>at MS as an American success story. It has all the classic elements: started
>small, with a crew of social misfits and eventually grew up.

>RobL
>------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------
>Rob Lowry         |                   
>PO Box 288        | 
>Rockford Wa 99030 | ral@otc.mhs.compuserve.com           robl@on-ramp.ior.com


Well, I disagree.  Microsoft succeeded  primarily because it was "chosen" by
IBM in about 1981 or so, needing an OS for their PC.  MS didn't even write
it; Seattle Computer did, and that was a port of CP/M.  Not much creativity.
MSDOS revisions 1.0 and 1.1 were pure crap.






Thread