1996-01-27 - Re: “This post is G-Rated”

Header Data

From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 78ea235c0ea5896ab421784441c13e3b74e2f9682de1515dc09c387bb23b4c7d
Message ID: <ad2d64060f0210042426@[205.199.118.202]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-27 23:46:25 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 07:46:25 +0800

Raw message

From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 07:46:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "This post is G-Rated"
Message-ID: <ad2d64060f0210042426@[205.199.118.202]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:33 PM 1/25/96, Mike McNally wrote:
>Bill Frantz writes:

> > and whole newsgroups.
>
>Since nobody "owns" newsgroups, and nobody controls what's posted to
>them, I don't see how that's possible at all.

I agree. When I was replying to Bill Frantz's points, I neglected to
comment on this point.

Suppose "alt.fan.barney" is rated G, by "someone." Since I can post stuff
with strong language, and worse, to alt.fan.barney, is it still rated G, or
was my stuff blocked?

When the Germans told MeinKampfuServe to block 200+ newsgroups (well, it's
clear that some BavarianKops showed MKS a list of groups that they thought
needed to be pulled, and MKS obliged them), a bunch of folks started
copying soc.culture.german on some highly explicit stuff normally found in
alt.sex.*. No word yet on whether soc.culture.german is now banned in
Germany.

--Tim May

Boycott espionage-enabled software!
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net  408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^756839 - 1  | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."









Thread