1996-01-26 - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail”

Header Data

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
To: Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
Message Hash: 1b12626f2f331305ec1369f0d1306964f7e1c3ef27cd05b2261996afd06b20fe
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960126021308.19760C-100000@larry.infi.net>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9601251855.A12680-0100000@styx.ios.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-26 09:13:52 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:13:52 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:13:52 +0800
To: Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
Subject: Re: "Gentlemen do not read each other's mail"
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9601251855.A12680-0100000@styx.ios.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960126021308.19760C-100000@larry.infi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




> > By not taking adequate steps to inform itself of the Japaneese
 intentions the US 
> > suffered the loss of a substantial part of the US fleet at Pearl Harbour.


   I've read that FDR had a humint source warning of a Japanese strike on 
Pearl Harbor. I also recall reading that J Edgar Hoover received a report 
of a diplomatic conversation detailing the planned attack, but sat on it.

The first was in a monograph which was putting forth the proposition that 
FDR  ardently desired to become involved in the war.  By the way, FDR was 
the man who made wage income, subject to federal taxation for the first 
time.

I don't remember where I read the second.

To me, both stories are plausible.





Thread