From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Message Hash: 914753e523ffee54ff912e5f2662821f618fd818c03c305e68fd19f596f0bb5f
Message ID: <199601260125.UAA16923@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960125140104.9352S-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-26 06:51:56 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 14:51:56 +0800
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 14:51:56 +0800
To: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: "Gentlemen do not read each other's mail"
In-Reply-To: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960125140104.9352S-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Message-ID: <199601260125.UAA16923@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Rich Graves writes:
> Relying on gentlemanliness to protect privacy is a fallacy.
Of course. The reason we study cryptography is because we can't trust
that people will behave like "gentlemen". However, is not the goal
here to assure that communications can be untappable and privacy
assured to all that wish to have privacy?
Perry
Return to January 1996
Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”