cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-03-25 - Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Message Hash: 21ebe862539b9428907f5181998a3b019ce8fbc8658836c7d73472d01ebf6152
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960325020948.13839A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Reply To: <wlJXiWq00YUvMMZph4@andrew.cmu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-25 07:28:13 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 15:28:13 +0800

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 15:28:13 +0800
To: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Subject: Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS
In-Reply-To: <wlJXiWq00YUvMMZph4@andrew.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960325020948.13839A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 25 Mar 1996, Declan B. McCullagh wrote:

> E. Clark writes:
> > I neither like nor trust the bill and, after the Digital Telephony 
> > Bill and its manner of passage, my trust in the good senator is zero.
> 
> I spoke to a couple folks about this at the CDA hearings in Philadelphia
> last week. Word on the streets from those who would know is that the
> Leahy Bill has NOT A CHANCE IN HELL of passing, and so is worth
> supporting to raise awareness of crypto.

I did a little weekend poking, I can confirm this.  If the Leahy bill 
passes, it will be a surprise (putting it mildly).

> 
> After DT and Clipper, it's our chance to put Clinton and the DoJ on the
> defensive for a change.
>

I suggest instead that everyone be nice and quiet.  If they get busy 
enough, this issue might not rear its ugly head for a few terms.

> -Declan
> 
> 

---
My prefered and soon to be permanent e-mail address: unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information

Thread