cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-03-26 - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame)

Header Data

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: unicorn@schloss.li (Black Unicorn)
Message Hash: ceaf4190b81308f5960a07b1f182dba2901c3615796762bd3ddd9a8d2bc48177
Message ID: <199603251937.LAA03810@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960325132049.26503B-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-26 00:42:36 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 08:42:36 +0800

Raw message

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 08:42:36 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li (Black Unicorn)
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O' , shame)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960325132049.26503B-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Message-ID: <199603251937.LAA03810@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> I think many people on the list here had the right idea generally.  No 
> legislation is good legislation for crypto.  Really the ITAR 
> applications are beseiged right now, and will probably fizzle out of 
> their own accord, not to mention the fact that they are de facto moot.
> 
> In practice it is trivial to subvert ITAR for the purposes of 
> worldwide crypto availability.

	You've obviously never brought a crypto product to market
before.  Granted, worldwide *personal* use of crypto availability is
trivial, but not corporate.

-- 
Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-601-9777x3
Community ConneXion, Inc.			FAX:     510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest")		sameer@c2.org

Thread