1996-03-25 - So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame)

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Message Hash: 88e3cc27be364f8eabd3925cf41d3361ff3aec14146d6f7072aa3dee7525a649
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960325075557.28271D-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <8lJfDXO00YUv87Z3A8@andrew.cmu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-25 20:15:40 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 04:15:40 +0800

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 04:15:40 +0800
To: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Subject: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O' , shame)
In-Reply-To: <8lJfDXO00YUv87Z3A8@andrew.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960325075557.28271D-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



If the Leahy bill is unacceptable, what legistlation is necessary? I 
can't see how the use of cryptography in the commission of a crime needs 
to be a separate offence, but I could see how it could be treated as a 
special circumstance - that doesn't really needed a new law though.

I do feel that it should be possible for courts to sub poena crypto keys, 
but that doesn't really need new law either (4th and 5th ammendments 
become _really_ important though (hmmm- there advantages to writing down a 
constitution after all :)

Simon

---
They say in  online country             So which side are you on boys
There is no middle way                  Which side are you on
You'll either be a Usenet man           Which side are you on boys
Or a thug for the CDA                   Which side are you on?
  National Union of Computer Operatives; Hackers, local 37   APL-CPIO






Thread