From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
Message Hash: 48a4e678a4d11676bdec1e97473a9d2cde0d598cd34926970d87f70e348b49cf
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960326054423.28374A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960325135047.25482A-100000@kelly.teleport.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-28 06:44:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 14:44:45 +0800
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 14:44:45 +0800
To: Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O' , , shame)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960325135047.25482A-100000@kelly.teleport.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960326054423.28374A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 25 Mar 1996, Rich Burroughs wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 1996, Simon Spero wrote:
>
> >
> > If the Leahy bill is unacceptable, what legistlation is necessary? I
> > can't see how the use of cryptography in the commission of a crime needs
> > to be a separate offence, but I could see how it could be treated as a
> > special circumstance - that doesn't really needed a new law though.
> [snip]
>
> Good question.
>
> Along this line -- what are the penalties for withholding other types of
> possible evidence from investigating officers? It seems that often the
> penalites for "computer crimes" are more harsh than for the "normal"
> version of the crime. Is that the case with the penalties in Leahy's bill?
I have personally been involved in cases involving fines of $75,000 per
day for noncompliance with a grand jury subpoena duces tecum calling for
the surrender of banking documents.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Rich Burroughs -- richieb@teleport.com -- psu07973@odin.cc.pdx.edu
> http://www.teleport.com/~richieb --- Opinions are mine, not Teleport's
> PGP key fingerprint: 1F A1 40 72 92 02 DE 7A 80 D0 5A 57 D3 1C 87 86
>
>
---
My prefered and soon to be permanent e-mail address: unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Return to March 1996
Return to “Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>”