1996-07-03 - Re: Info on alleged new German digital wiretapping law?

Header Data

From: um@c2.org (Ulf Moeller)
To: llurch@networking.stanford.edu
Message Hash: 5442b4f773265d75926bd47a549f6518d50be73d4e141055853c50a7d944493f
Message ID: <m0ubEel-00006nC@ulf.mali.sub.org>
Reply To: <autopost.836344076.1489@ulf.mali.sub.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-03 03:56:28 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 11:56:28 +0800

Raw message

From: um@c2.org (Ulf Moeller)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 11:56:28 +0800
To: llurch@networking.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: Info on alleged new German digital wiretapping law?
In-Reply-To: <autopost.836344076.1489@ulf.mali.sub.org>
Message-ID: <m0ubEel-00006nC@ulf.mali.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu> writes:

>None of the Europeans I ran into at today's SAFE conference had even heard
>of the legislation decried at
>
> http://fight-censorship.dementia.org/fight-censorship/dl?num=3027
>
>and in alt.fan.ernst-zundel. What's up?

The report is correct.

The mainstream press has completely ingnored the wiretap legislation,
probably because it is part of the long-awaited new telecommunications
law to end the Telekom monopoly.





Thread