From: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
To: s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
Message Hash: fcec1c02833edd538426b15d3fb1f3a4c7cefe4cc0654ff74710d5bfb1a27270
Message ID: <199601152213.RAA19247@universe.digex.net>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9601132350.A15455-0100000@aix2.uottawa.ca>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-16 04:55:21 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 12:55:21 +0800
From: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 12:55:21 +0800
To: s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
Subject: Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9601132350.A15455-0100000@aix2.uottawa.ca>
Message-ID: <199601152213.RAA19247@universe.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca writes:
>My apologies for responding to a political post.
>
>On Sat, 13 Jan 1996, Charlie Merritt wrote:
>
>> I feel that public exposure
>> is enough to put fear into these anonymous government employees.
>> You will note that when they get the mad_bomber
>> some FBI guy jumps right up and takes credit, live, on TV.
>> But when the Air Force orders a $300 toilet seat NO ONE is credited.
>
>It's interesting how we advocate anonymity for ourselves but not for our
>opponents. Feeling righteous?
I agree with Charlie. These government employees claim to be working
for the american taxpayers, of which group I am a member. Government
agents must, therefore, expect to be accountable to the citizens, while
accountability in the other direction is virtually the definition of
tyranny.
Return to January 1996
Return to “Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>”