1996-01-08 - RE: “trust management” vs. “certified identity”

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 0210bf748e54ff7ed748cae26eace4f8e539ae1393785203d113f30402f70742
Message ID: <v02120d14ad16610af24f@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-08 06:38:13 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 8 Jan 1996 14:38:13 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 1996 14:38:13 +0800
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: "trust management" vs. "certified identity"
Message-ID: <v02120d14ad16610af24f@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 1:40 1/7/96, Frank O'Dwyer wrote:

>But it is usually easier to
>determine (and vouch for) who a stranger is than how trustworthy
>they are, if only because there are quick and easy real-world
>mechanisms for this (driver's licence, passport,etc.).   That's all
>I meant.

Though it may seem that way, I am not so sure that it is true. I am told
that you can buy a CA driver licence in the hispanic part of San Francisco
for about $50. Hologram and all. Reputations can take years to establish. I
am would feel more comfortable to sign certain statements about the
(on-line) character or technical skills of some people on this list whom I
have never met, than to sign the PGP key of an utter stranger that shows me
his Alabama ID card.


-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.







Thread