1996-07-04 - Re: Lack of PGP signatures

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: Charles Watt <watt@sware.com>
Message Hash: b9028905a736bc4f1e2c42d8fafe8461ed377e6b96ecd6dd4034764f6c0c2bab
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.94.960703171630.5088N-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <9607031935.AA08888@mordred.sware.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-04 03:20:22 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Jul 1996 11:20:22 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 1996 11:20:22 +0800
To: Charles Watt <watt@sware.com>
Subject: Re: Lack of PGP signatures
In-Reply-To: <9607031935.AA08888@mordred.sware.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.94.960703171630.5088N-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 3 Jul 1996, Charles Watt wrote:

> -----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
> Proc-Type: 4,MIC-CLEAR
> Content-Domain: RFC822
> Originator-Certificate:
>  MIIBvzCCAWkCEFmOln6ip0w49CuyWr9vDVUwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQECBQAwWTELMAkG
>  A1UEBhMCVVMxGDAWBgNVBAoTD1NlY3VyZVdhcmUgSW5jLjEXMBUGA1UECxMOU2Vj
>  dXJlV2FyZSBQQ0ExFzAVBgNVBAsTDkVuZ2luZWVyaW5nIENBMB4XDTk1MDUwODIw
>  MjMzNVoXDTk3MDUwNzIwMjMzNVowcDELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxGDAWBgNVBAoTD1Nl
>  Y3VyZVdhcmUgSW5jLjEXMBUGA1UECxMOU2VjdXJlV2FyZSBQQ0ExFzAVBgNVBAsT
>  DkVuZ2luZWVyaW5nIENBMRUwEwYDVQQDEwxDaGFybGVzIFdhdHQwWTAKBgRVCAEB
>  AgICBANLADBIAkEM2ZSp7b6eqDqK5RbPFpd6DGSLjbpHOZU07pUcdgJXiduj9Ytf
>  1rsmf/adaplQr+X5FeoIdT/bVSv2MUi3gY0eFwIDAQABMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUA
>  A0EApEjzeBjiSnGImJXgeY1K8HWSufpJ2DpLBF7DYqqIVAX9H7gmfOJhfeGEYVjK
>  aTxjgASxqHhzkx7PkOnL4JrN+Q==
> MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
>  BeMb0/+U7Gnp8Xx2J5GUFwFI2hLb0giw65Y+HudXPvuSMDdeBToKOQXkR/HvyvKr
>  kM+gtqWFV3Q/2xKS6iIeYRc=
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

And then there's the part about it being ugly as sin for people with
non-crypto-aware clients, and a performance hit for people with clients that
are crypto-aware. 

-rich






Thread