From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9a7de4edf8a7b96a817321423dc90331ff7249967805d8995b6fbd1bf342165f
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960112133738.10905e@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-12 22:03:11 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 06:03:11 +0800
From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 06:03:11 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960112133738.10905e@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
This seems to have been confirmed in private email. So, what's the
real target?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1996 13:15:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
To: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
Subject: Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com
On Fri, 12 Jan 1996, Eric Murray wrote:
> > Unless someone comes forward to say that they were the target of this
> > attack, I'd guess that the target is the remailer network itself.
>
> The target, Homer Wilson Smith, is one of the people embroiled in
> the Scientology wars. I don't want to get into the recent history
> of repression and abuse by Scientology agents & sympathizers, but
> my guess is that this is an attempt to harass someone that
> Scientology doesn't like.
Yes, I've heard of him. But doesn't the given address just forward to a
remailer? Have you seen anything to indicate that the flood really goes to
him?
Actually, last time I saw, he was no longer really embroiled. He was
backing off to become a neutral ISP. He still runs lazarus, of course.
-rich
Return to January 1996
Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”
1996-01-12 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 06:03:11 +0800) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>