1997-06-16 - Re: Avoid loud warnings–it only attracts disruptors

Header Data

From: Alan <alano@teleport.com>
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 23b2c0aa65d01a304216b19259541d9336066f94b82a0f0685ca6b9707681e8c
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970616134158.4171C-100000@linda.teleport.com>
Reply To: <v03102805afcb4eabeb59@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-16 21:06:46 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 05:06:46 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan <alano@teleport.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 05:06:46 +0800
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Avoid loud warnings--it only attracts disruptors
In-Reply-To: <v03102805afcb4eabeb59@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970616134158.4171C-100000@linda.teleport.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Tim May wrote:

> (I admit to having a perverse side, too. No suprise to many of you. Several
> years ago I posted some binaries to the brand-new newsgroup,
> "alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.children". I claimed they were some hot
> lolitas, though in fact they were misc. PGP noise, with hidden text
> messages running down some of the diagonals, to get me off the hook if some
> DA claimed they were real pictures and demanded the decryption key. I
> wanted to shake things up. Got a lot of outraged responses, too.)

Were they outraged that it was not kiddy porn or outraged that they could
not get to it or outraged because you claimed it was kiddy porn?  (I tend
to direct people to
http://www.thecorporation.com/oneoffs/96/kittyporn/index.html for that
sort of stuff...)  

Makes you wonder what they were doing reading that group in the first
place...

alano@teleport.com | "Those who are without history are doomed to retype it."






Thread