1995-11-02 - Re: From Bill Frezza: Electronic Warfare

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: dc712da80c4bf93d52bb71416d8c8a4eca740c936cc94c8585dc3a49a55fca7f
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951031212735.8947A-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <199511010500.GAA03716@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-02 10:33:19 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 18:33:19 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 18:33:19 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: From Bill Frezza: Electronic Warfare
In-Reply-To: <199511010500.GAA03716@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951031212735.8947A-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 1 Nov 1995, Anonymous wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Oct 1995, Bill Frezza <frezza@interramp.com> wrote:
> 
> > Attached is a column that will appear on the op-ed page of tomorrow's
> > (10/30) Communications Week that was stimulated largely by a report filed
> 
> > Cypherpunks mailing list (majordomo@toad.com) you can get some excellent
> 
> list address is cypherpunks@toad.com
> list manager is majordomo@toad.com
> sending list mail to majordomo will not work

Sending mail without valid commands to majordomo will give you a help
file.  You don't *really* want the actual list address to be published
everywhere, do you? I think the noise/signal ratio is high enough already.

cypherpunks-request@toad.com would have been better, because it gives a 
more specific help file. URL would have been better still. But not the 
address.

-rich





Thread