From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6392b46b9e8674cc04e41d300f0eb6a000e3dd99b68f1452327fbd244ac01b03
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.970428005110.13976A-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-04-28 07:52:42 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 00:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 00:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: PATHS: Internet Taxation (Wednesday May 7, 4:15 pm) (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.970428005110.13976A-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
FYI for SF Bay Aryans.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY HORIZONS SEMINAR
INTERNET TAXATION:
ECONOMICS, TECHNOLOGY AND LAW
CHARLES McLURE, Jr.
HOOVER INSTITUTION
Wednesday, May 7, 1997, 4:15 pm
Manning Faculty Lounge, Stanford Law School
(RSVP Susan French, SLTPC@forsythe.stanford.edu, or 723-0981)
Should electronic commerce be taxed, and how?
What should be taxed, income, sales, or both?
Who should tax, the federal government, states, or both?
Should a special excise tax be imposed on selected aspects of
electronic commerce?
Is Internet taxation feasible, and how?
Answering these and similar questions requires agreement on the
appropriate economic objectives of Internet taxation combined with an
understanding of the dynamic interplay between technological and legal
forces.
A draft paper will be available from http://www-techlaw.stanford.edu
after May 2.
Charles E. McLure, Jr., a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution,
specializes in the economics of taxation and tax reform. He has
served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Analysis,
a senior economist on the staff of the President's Council of Economic
Advisers, vice president of the National Bureau of Economic Research,
and a tax policy consultant to various countries, the World Bank, the
International Monetary Fund, and the United Nations.
Policy and Technology Horizons Seminars (PATHS) examine technological
developments that may require a fundamental re-examination of policy,
law, and regulation. Sponsored by the Stanford Law and Technology
Policy Center, PATHS help identify critical policy issues in time for
intelligent policymaking.
Return to April 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”