1996-04-29 - Re: Proving that you’re not a nym [was Re: Mindshare and Java]

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Message Hash: 79c39ffa4ba626e42439d8fce1e3c45f3c8a504832197f67f7cd4819c6bdccda
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960428175310.19393A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Reply To: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960428114931.13032D-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-29 03:38:08 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 11:38:08 +0800

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 11:38:08 +0800
To: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Proving that you're not a nym [was Re: Mindshare and Java]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960428114931.13032D-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960428175310.19393A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 28 Apr 1996, Rich Graves wrote:

> In this specific case, no, there is nothing you can do to prove that
> you're not the Unicorn of Color, because there are no signatures on his or
> her key.
> 

Would you PLEASE, get your facts straight?

Try checking it yourself maybe, instead of assuming this to be true
because someone else said so?

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com






Thread