Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com> (71 posts)
Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.
Threads
Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP
Re: Netscape, CAs, and Verisign
Re: “PGP-Scape”? (was Re: Our “New Order”)
X.509 certs that don’t guarantee identity
Netscape 2.01 fixes server vulnerabilities by breaking the client…
Netscape Export + 128bits SSL (?)
Mindshare and Java
- 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 22:00:06 -0700 (PDT)) - Mindshare and Java - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 22:49:05 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 12:39:29 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - mrm@netcom.com (Marianne Mueller)
- 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 14:09:07 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 17:33:08 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
- 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 17:43:27 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-28 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 05:44:44 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Moltar Ramone <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
- 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 11:51:37 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 14:59:12 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 07:02:49 -0700 (PDT)) - Cypherpunks: Cesspit? (was Re: Mindshare and Java) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 11:49:47 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Mindshare and Java - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 12:53:34 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Moltar Ramone <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
Re: Notes from the SF Physical Cypherpunks meeting
US versions of Netscape now available
Re: US versions of Netscape now available
Re: Netscape
- 1996-07-20 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 19:37:25 +0800) - Re: Netscape - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1996-07-21 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 09:20:20 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- 1996-07-21 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 13:13:18 +0800) - Re: Netscape - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
- 1996-07-21 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 16:41:12 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-07-21 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 21:59:33 +0800) - Re: Netscape - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
- 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 14:37:09 +0800) - Re: Netscape - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
- 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 03:00:50 +0800) - Re: Netscape - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 01:29:13 +0800) - Re: Netscape - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
Re: Netscape
- 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 10:29:48 +0800) - Re: Netscape - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
- 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 12:09:02 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 15:18:49 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
- 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 14:49:06 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 17:12:44 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
- 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 18:18:37 +0800) - Re: Netscape - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
- 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 12:57:48 +0800) - Re: Netscape - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
- 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 20:04:16 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
- 1996-07-24 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 20:32:33 +0800) - Re: Netscape - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
- 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 14:44:34 +0800) - Re: Netscape - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
- 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 16:39:53 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 11:55:15 +0800) - Re: Netscape - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
Re: Netscape
- 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 10:26:11 +0800) - Re: Netscape - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 11:39:05 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
Re: Netscape
- 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 08:02:36 +0800) - Re: Netscape - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
- 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 16:39:43 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- 1996-07-24 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 17:30:40 +0800) - Re: Netscape - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
- 1996-07-24 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 18:07:19 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 17:27:46 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Ted Anderson <ota+@transarc.com>
- 1996-07-23 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 05:02:57 +0800) - Re: Netscape - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
- 1996-07-23 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 06:24:55 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Ted Anderson <ota+@transarc.com>
Re: Netscape
- 1996-07-24 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 05:40:57 +0800) - Re: Netscape - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-07-24 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 07:19:37 +0800) - Re: Netscape - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
- 1996-07-25 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 12:46:24 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- 1996-07-25 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 11:12:18 +0800) - Re: Netscape - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
Let’s Say “No!” to Single, World Versions of Software
The “Secure” version of Netscape for Linux is NOT
Re: Stop the presses – Anti-terrorism bill not that bad
Re: [Long] A history of Netscape/MSIE problems
Re: Clipper III on the table
WebTV a “munition”
- 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 08:16:59 -0800 (PST)) - WebTV a “munition” - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
- 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 13:13:16 -0800 (PST)) - Re: WebTV a “munition” - Rich Graves <rcgraves@ix.netcom.com>
- 1996-11-09 (Sat, 9 Nov 1996 08:10:56 -0800 (PST)) - Re: WebTV a “munition” - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
- 1996-11-11 (Mon, 11 Nov 1996 14:26:53 -0800 (PST)) - Re: WebTV a “munition” - iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
- 1996-11-12 (Mon, 11 Nov 1996 21:03:28 -0800 (PST)) - Returned mail: User Unknown - Open Net Postmaster <postmaster@opennet.net.au>
- 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 13:50:47 -0800 (PST)) - Re: WebTV a “munition” - “Jon Leonard” <jleonard@divcom.umop-ap.com>
- 1996-11-09 (Sat, 9 Nov 1996 10:06:51 -0800 (PST)) - Re: WebTV a “munition” - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
- 1996-11-09 (Sat, 9 Nov 1996 13:57:16 -0800 (PST)) - Re: WebTV a “munition” - “Jon Leonard” <jleonard@divcom.umop-ap.com>
- 1996-11-09 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 17:15:39 -0800 (PST)) - Re: WebTV a “munition” - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- 1996-11-09 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 17:39:56 -0800 (PST)) - Re: WebTV a “munition” - “David Lesher / hated by RBOC’s in 5 states” <wb8foz@wauug.erols.com>
Re: HP announcing some International Cryptography stuff on Monday
SSL Insecurity
- 1997-01-09 (Thu, 9 Jan 1997 09:42:07 -0800 (PST)) - SSL Insecurity - Rick Osborne <osborne@gateway.grumman.com>
- 1997-01-09 (Thu, 9 Jan 1997 13:45:25 -0800 (PST)) - Re: SSL Insecurity - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- 1997-01-10 (Thu, 9 Jan 1997 21:40:36 -0800 (PST)) - Re: SSL Insecurity - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Re: SSL weakness affecting links from pa
Full Strength Stronghold 2.0 Released Worldwide
communicator
- 1997-05-11 (Mon, 12 May 1997 03:50:44 +0800) - communicator - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
- 1997-05-11 (Mon, 12 May 1997 05:54:10 +0800) - Re: communicator - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
referers and W3 (fwd)
- 1997-05-18 (Sun, 18 May 1997 14:59:30 +0800) - referers and W3 (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
More stories from the Bell jar…
Re: McVeigh
- 1997-06-03 (Wed, 4 Jun 1997 06:14:40 +0800) - Re: McVeigh - Hallam-Baker <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
- 1997-06-03 (Wed, 4 Jun 1997 07:39:22 +0800) - Re: McVeigh - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
- 1997-06-04 (Wed, 4 Jun 1997 12:14:36 +0800) - Re: McVeigh - frissell@panix.com
- 1997-06-04 (Wed, 4 Jun 1997 12:18:48 +0800) - Re: McVeigh - frissell@panix.com
- 1997-06-04 (Thu, 5 Jun 1997 00:33:58 +0800) - Re: McVeigh - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
- 1997-06-04 (Thu, 5 Jun 1997 01:07:21 +0800) - Re: McVeigh - Hallam-Baker <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
- 1997-06-04 (Thu, 5 Jun 1997 05:13:41 +0800) - Re: McVeigh - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Re: Impact of Netscape kernel hole
Re: Impact of Netscape kernel hole
Netscape Exploit
- 1997-06-15 (Sun, 15 Jun 1997 12:12:43 +0800) - Netscape Exploit - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
- 1997-06-15 (Sun, 15 Jun 1997 16:36:51 +0800) - Re: Netscape Exploit - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
e$: Skins vs. Shirts
- 1997-06-15 (Sun, 15 Jun 1997 09:06:23 +0800) - e$: Skins vs. Shirts - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Kerrey bill introduced in Senate
- 1997-06-17 (Wed, 18 Jun 1997 05:50:54 +0800) - Kerrey bill introduced in Senate - Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
- 1997-06-18 (Wed, 18 Jun 1997 08:53:00 +0800) - Re: Kerrey bill introduced in Senate - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- 1997-06-18 (Wed, 18 Jun 1997 10:47:41 +0800) - The Tao - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
- 1997-06-18 (Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:44:59 +0800) - Re: The Tao - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
- 1997-06-18 (Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:59:53 +0800) - Re: The Tao - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
- 1997-06-18 (Thu, 19 Jun 1997 04:25:38 +0800) - Re: The Tao - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
- 1997-06-18 (Thu, 19 Jun 1997 04:43:50 +0800) - Re: The Tao - Alan <alano@teleport.com>
Re: A better DES challenge
Re: Comparing Cryptographic Key Sizes
CNN - Encryption bill expected to pass House - June 23, 1997
More about Netscape Bug finder
McCain Open to Key Recovery Alternative by Rebecca Vesely 3:06pm 11.Jul.97.PDT Senator John McCain, sponsor of legislation that would create a domestic key recovery system for all encrypted commercial transactions and personal communications, said Friday that he is open to hearing alternatives to such a plan. “We are not wedded entirely to key recovery,” the Arizona Republican said in an interview. McCain, chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, and Senator Bob Kerrey (D-Nebraska) introduced the Secure Public Networks Act last month. Privacy advocates and much of the high-tech industry oppose domestic key recovery on grounds that it would violate civil rights and be impractical and expensive to build and manage. McCain said he met with Microsoft representatives recently to discuss a new technology being developed by the software giant that could be less intrusive and problematic than key recovery. The senator also said he plans to meet with Netscape officials next week to discuss yet another alternative. Officials from Netscape were not immediately available for comment. “I’m saying, OK, if you have another solution, I’d like to hear it,” McCain said, though he stressed that protecting national security remains his “first obligation.” The McCain-Kerrey bill includes provisions for setting up a voluntary domestic key recovery system, including incentives for those who participate. Critics say participation in the key-management infrastructure wouldn’t really be voluntary - it would be a prerequisite to conducting electronic commerce. Encryption, or data-scrambling technology, is widely viewed as the cornerstone to e-commerce because it conceals credit card numbers and other personal information traveling over networks. Key recovery, as outlined in the bill, would create a system of certificate authorities to whom users would give a copy of their data keys. Law enforcement could then access that copy of your key through a court order. McCain’s flexibility on the issue could influence the debate over how to protect national security while allowing a free market to flourish in the digital age. Just two days ago, at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the bill, FBI director Louis Freeh testified on the need for mandatory domestic key recovery, and some senators on the committee, notably the chairman, Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), seemed to agree that some sort of domestic key recovery is needed to allow law enforcement to wiretap suspect digital communications and transactions.
- 1997-07-12 (Sat, 12 Jul 1997 08:25:01 +0800) - McCain Open to Key Recovery Alternative by Rebecca Vesely 3:06pm 11.Jul.97.PDT Senator John McCain, sponsor of legislation that would create a domestic key recovery system for all encrypted commercial transactions and personal communications, said Friday that he is open to hearing alternatives to such a plan. “We are not wedded entirely to key recovery,” the Arizona Republican said in an interview. McCain, chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, and Senator Bob Kerrey (D-Nebraska) introduced the Secure Public Networks Act last month. Privacy advocates and much of the high-tech industry oppose domestic key recovery on grounds that it would violate civil rights and be impractical and expensive to build and manage. McCain said he met with Microsoft representatives recently to discuss a new technology being developed by the software giant that could be less intrusive and problematic than key recovery. The senator also said he plans to meet with Netscape officials next week to discuss yet another alternative. Officials from Netscape were not immediately available for comment. “I’m saying, OK, if you have another solution, I’d like to hear it,” McCain said, though he stressed that protecting national security remains his “first obligation.” The McCain-Kerrey bill includes provisions for setting up a voluntary domestic key recovery system, including incentives for those who participate. Critics say participation in the key-management infrastructure wouldn’t really be voluntary - it would be a prerequisite to conducting electronic commerce. Encryption, or data-scrambling technology, is widely viewed as the cornerstone to e-commerce because it conceals credit card numbers and other personal information traveling over networks. Key recovery, as outlined in the bill, would create a system of certificate authorities to whom users would give a copy of their data keys. Law enforcement could then access that copy of your key through a court order. McCain’s flexibility on the issue could influence the debate over how to protect national security while allowing a free market to flourish in the digital age. Just two days ago, at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the bill, FBI director Louis Freeh testified on the need for mandatory domestic key recovery, and some senators on the committee, notably the chairman, Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), seemed to agree that some sort of domestic key recovery is needed to allow law enforcement to wiretap suspect digital communications and transactions. - Alan Olsen <root@nwdtc.com>
Verisign gets export approval
Netscape browser crypto
[fwd][news] Netscape meets gov’t security standard
Netscape 5 will be GPL’ed
Questions for Magaziner?
What was the quid pro quo for Wassenaar countries?