From: Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 12:09:02 +0800
To: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Subject: Re: Netscape
In-Reply-To: <199607220009.RAA08680@dns2.noc.best.net>
Message-ID: <31F2DBAE.41C6@netscape.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


James A. Donald wrote:
> 
> At 03:27 PM 7/20/96 -0700, Tom Weinstein wrote:
> > Why not consider what the consequences will be?  Do you seriously
> > believe that this will make the government stop enforcing ITAR?
> 
> Yes:
> 
> Widespread politically motivated disobedience forces
> the state to either demonize the disobedient, (as with drug users)
> or give up enforcement.  This is a standard and effective method
> of forcing the repeal of laws, a method which has had a long record
> of success for several hundred years.

A handful of cyperpunks hardly constitutes "widespread polititcally
motivated disobedience".  In any case, the demonization has already
begun; they point their fingers at the four horsemen of the internet
at every oportunity.

What I object to is anonymous activists who perform acts at no risk to
themselves which make it harder for those of us who are trying to bring
strong crypto to everyone.

> The states cohesion derives from its legitimacy, and threats to
> legitimacy and cohesion are treated very seriously by government
> officials.
> 
> Threatening the states legitimacy is arguably more effective in
> influencing government behavior than blowing up federal office
> buildings.

The first step is to create at least a strong minority.  A handful of
cypherpunks can be largely ignored.  We have to get the general
public using and educated about strong crypto before civil disobedience
will mean anything.

-- 
You should only break rules of style if you can    | Tom Weinstein
coherently explain what you gain by so doing.      | tomw@netscape.com