From: Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b17f2d2c74da0337a7e2ad113e6b4a8a0a8a9cd8ebcf11271f8196bd92d85e74
Message ID: <32390335.6231@netscape.com>
Reply To: <517brn$lu7@life.ai.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-13 08:57:27 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 16:57:27 +0800
From: Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 16:57:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [Long] A history of Netscape/MSIE problems
In-Reply-To: <517brn$lu7@life.ai.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <32390335.6231@netscape.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Hallam-Baker wrote:
>
> There was a long list of security holes in SSL, PCT plugged a good
> number of them and SSL v3 plugged a few.
This statement surprises me. It appears to mean that you think PCT has
fewer holes than SSL 3.0. If you know of any holes in SSL 3.0, I'd be
very interested in hearing about them.
--
You should only break rules of style if you can | Tom Weinstein
coherently explain what you gain by so doing. | tomw@netscape.com
Return to September 1996
Return to “Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>”