From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ea7badf904fc48a4321b19accb500581461f25fe3978d215bab2fd83e8e7c320
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.94.960720233212.873A-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.94.960720230708.401B-100000@gak>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-21 08:41:12 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 16:41:12 +0800
From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 16:41:12 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Netscape
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.94.960720230708.401B-100000@gak>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.94.960720233212.873A-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, 20 Jul 1996, Mark M. wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jul 1996, Tom Weinstein wrote:
>
> > Why not consider what the consequences will be? Do you seriously
> > believe that this will make the government stop enforcing ITAR?
>
> The government has yet to enforce ITAR. The only thing they have been doing
> is threatening companies who make products with strong crypto. If anyone was
> ever actually put on trial for a violation of ITAR, it would almost certainly
> be found to be unconstitutional.
So do it. None of this anonymous bullshit, or trying to drag Netscape into
it.
I'd donate whatever I could to a Cypherpunk Legal Defense Fund. We only need
one volunteer with a lot of time on his/her hands.
- -rich
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQBVAwUBMfHPwpNcNyVVy0jxAQEckQH/UfScMaluCISTxIQeFEGysHlJ0bdEirJS
XVnuXDA/CPlD7TtCHBOUCcoCn/bCq5rMngLkbtKvDMHCgpRiADTpuA==
=BWaW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to July 1996
Return to “Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>”