From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: Peter Wayner <pcw@access.digex.net>
Message Hash: f624eaf7689ead916fe1a424e632522e387550b1561b86b8189d962cad74e0e5
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951121193502.5283A-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <v02130512acd7941208f9@[199.125.128.5]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-22 04:03:28 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 12:03:28 +0800
From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 12:03:28 +0800
To: Peter Wayner <pcw@access.digex.net>
Subject: Re: Are there enough FBI agents to handle Digital Telephony?????
In-Reply-To: <v02130512acd7941208f9@[199.125.128.5]>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951121193502.5283A-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Don't the numbers include all types of interceptions, both wiretaps and
records of what number you call?
You also don't need to listen live. Recording media is cheap these days.
Record all calls, put into a database keyed by time and number called,
refer to it later.
-rich
Return to November 1995
Return to “Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>”