From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: abc22f68dd8a671b6a9e5075595d8ce5f907eb901b329d4e39e106cf2846496c
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960503172938.20948K-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-04 07:12:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 May 1996 15:12:17 +0800
From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 4 May 1996 15:12:17 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: An interesting front end for the replay remailer
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960503172938.20948K-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
These folks' politics don't make much sense to me (but I gather that they
really, really don't like Jehova's Witnesses); it's their setting up an
"alternative" front end for the replay remailer that caught my interest.
http://www.nano.no/~telemark/anon.html
One could say that this makes a case for PGP-signing web pages, but on the
other hand, the remailers don't and shouldn't care about content, so who
cares if someone "misappropriates" a remailer. What are they "taking"
anyway?
-rich
Return to May 1996
Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”
1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 15:12:17 +0800) - An interesting front end for the replay remailer - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>