cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-04-25 - Re: arbiter/escrow agent for hire

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Message Hash: 29b3e1f0970168fd77f01f4080c6986067b4b456e9829729ad61a0d9885eb373
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960425030044.3252P-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Reply To: <01I3X9N6RA1W8Y50LP@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-25 07:02:33 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:02:33 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Subject: Re: arbiter/escrow agent for hire
In-Reply-To: <01I3X9N6RA1W8Y50LP@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960425030044.3252P-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 24 Apr 1996, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:

> From:	IN%"bryce@digicash.com" 24-APR-1996 10:05:20.14
> 
> >1. Acceptable digital signature upon the "bet statement" 
> >from each bettor.  (Note that PGP signatures from PGP key
> >pairs which are not connected to me via the Web of Trust, or
> >which are not verifiable by me via an out-of-band
> >connection, are not acceptable digital signatures.  This is
> >because of the MITM attack problem, not because  I need True
> >Names to be connected to the signatures.)
> 
> 	IIRC, currently Black Unicorn doesn't have any signatures on
> his public key of others. Therefore, this requirement, while understandable,
> could cause a bit of a difficulty in the current situation.

Please obtain a copy of my current key by finger.

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com

Thread