From: “Brian A. LaMacchia” <bal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
To: adam@lighthouse.homeport.org
Message Hash: 28443bd6cea33a640e7cf4482507a7eeaba523f54abf6eda707eef08f8bdae9e
Message ID: <9512010651.AA21856@toad.com>
Reply To: <199512010605.BAA18775@homeport.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-02 16:24:51 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 00:24:51 +0800
From: "Brian A. LaMacchia" <bal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 00:24:51 +0800
To: adam@lighthouse.homeport.org
Subject: Re: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199512010605.BAA18775@homeport.org>
Message-ID: <9512010651.AA21856@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 01:05:49 -0500 (EST)
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8b]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1647
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Precedence: bulk
(Btw, Bal, is Netbsd1.1 stable yet? :)
Seems stable enough to me, although I've only been running 1.1 since the
official release a couple of days ago. I was able to trigger Scott
Westin's LiveScript with a Linux Netscape binary in 1.1's Linux
compatibility mode. That's stable enough for me.
Oh, and PGP 2.6.2 built right out of the box :-)
--bal
Return to December 1995
Return to “sameer <sameer@c2.org>”