1996-04-29 - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: mkj@october.segno.com
Message Hash: 901bbf44be6a76da33ad2305969b122b488f9cbeaa9b322848c2eedd017edfe4
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960428163305.12806E-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Reply To: <199604281221.AA01603@october.segno.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-29 02:20:44 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 10:20:44 +0800

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 10:20:44 +0800
To: mkj@october.segno.com
Subject: Re: CryptoAnarchy: What's wrong with this picture?
In-Reply-To: <199604281221.AA01603@october.segno.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960428163305.12806E-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 28 Apr 1996 mkj@october.segno.com wrote:

[...]

> Most other arguments put forth so far in this thread, about how people
> "won't stand for" certain government behaviors and so forth, I don't
> find convincing.  Modern military technologies, especially in the
> U.S., make the prospects of a sucessful popular uprising dubious.

C.f., Chechnya, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Columbia.  See Also Generally,
various and numerous publications on the successes of low and medium
intensity conflict campaigns against modern armies.

(Note that I don't think it will come to this in the United States, but
your assumption is a faulty one).

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com






Thread