1996-01-27 - Re: USPS Secure Email

Header Data

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: cd88c6d44d955ccfe18a39fde4e80ede1c818cf6db9325498739b77a34ce0a53
Message ID: <199601270740.CAA05685@thor.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <9601270226.AA18376@mhv.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-27 07:56:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 15:56:49 +0800

Raw message

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 15:56:49 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: USPS Secure Email
In-Reply-To: <9601270226.AA18376@mhv.net>
Message-ID: <199601270740.CAA05685@thor.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Lynne L. Harrison, Esq. writes:
> ******Begin Forwarded Message*********
> >I just read in "legal.online" that the Postal Service plans to provide
> >secure email service.  It will include encryption plus offer U.S. mail fraud
> >protection.  Of course there is no estimate on cost.

The latest issue of "legal.online" that's actually online appears to be July
1995. I rooted around on www.usps.gov but there's not much there. Does
someone have a pointer to soft- or hardcopy of the actual proposal? Anyone
know how they plan to do digital postage?

Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>
Looks like jim bell will soon prompt me to try to crank up procmail again....

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBMQnW0ynaAKQPVHDZAQHF7wf/brK8Ca4drdogJuznOIKox/BIi2rv45LP
KarbnYRyYmJcPrlUkedtV4EUK9W7W02JWHQF+LKvJHfEpWYjqmCx/jPiJBdf00zC
q+cUKOnEvml1BAOy9Ab/TfIRxa79wZg7K7IajSm2lAOtf9M+3pSMaLpb5jNxxzf/
pyPYnXsj9hIX0Jp3fNaGjvSUDO3Iu5SEoxmT98uQ+7tXZvQ98toy7EgBY/RFl6b9
c/ShSuhxxsPl/SBMHjbpH/gaxr2IaINN+HU/ncopF7a/dx0Osm1cOxBixac2QHf2
QH5uqUc560BzCpb6FTjsUZtx0PGOrDF44sbXsrNJRWPGjU1V3p6t0g==
=g2dN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread