From: “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: fafa2fb586e557ade55b8bd69d299a12a795da1aa369c79c3071d0fbfa4fc727
Message ID: <m0tCWQC-0004JWC@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-06 18:55:18 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 02:55:18 +0800
From: "Peter D. Junger" <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 02:55:18 +0800
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: lp ?
Message-ID: <m0tCWQC-0004JWC@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
"Perry E. Metzger" writes:
:
: Thaddeus J. Beier writes:
: > So, if this person was sending cryptographics codes from Switzerland
: > to Israel, the code would have been imported to the US, then exported
: > by UUNET. They can't do that, can they? Probably nobody would prosecute,
: > but it might be something to threaten UUNET with if one of their Northern
: > Virginia neighbors ever wanted something the couldn't get otherwise.
:
: It isn't clear that telecoms treaties don't implicitly make this legal
: in spite of the export regulations.
Once again, what the ITAR forbid is the disclosure of cryptographic
software to a foreign person within or without the United States, so
it does not make any difference whether the message containing the
code passes through the United States or not.
--
Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH
Internet: junger@pdj2-ra.f-remote.cwru.edu junger@samsara.law.cwru.edu
Return to November 1995
Return to “Sten Drescher <dreschs@mpd.tandem.com>”