1996-07-07 - Re: CCC Crypto Lock

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: Tim Philp <tphilp@bfree.on.ca>
Message Hash: dc84b74c1a495c86deb24b9598c67b835c827145eb43fbb4eb4967fa145581f9
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.94.960706160110.26242B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <19004146800633@bfree.on.ca>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-07 01:42:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 7 Jul 1996 09:42:40 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 1996 09:42:40 +0800
To: Tim Philp <tphilp@bfree.on.ca>
Subject: Re: CCC Crypto Lock
In-Reply-To: <19004146800633@bfree.on.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.94.960706160110.26242B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 7 Jul 1996, Tim Philp wrote:

> The fact that this patent was issued indicates to me that the patent office
> does not understand computer technology.

Gee. Next you'll be telling us that the US Congress isn't always sensitive
to libertarian issues.

-rich

Thread

• Return to July 1996

• Return to ““Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>”
• Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”

• Return to “Tim Philp <tphilp@bfree.on.ca>”

• 1996-07-06 (Sun, 7 Jul 1996 06:17:56 +0800) - Re: CCC Crypto Lock - Tim Philp <tphilp@bfree.on.ca>
  • 1996-07-07 (Sun, 7 Jul 1996 09:42:40 +0800) - Re: CCC Crypto Lock - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    • 1996-07-07 (Sun, 7 Jul 1996 17:47:32 +0800) - Re: CCC Crypto Lock - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>