From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4da6aabd20cfc79c225028eb175c3fb600fd7f2ca2fb73b6e429d9f5cb548165
Message ID: <199512151829.KAA13449@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-15 20:49:12 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 04:49:12 +0800
From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 04:49:12 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: .PWL spin
Message-ID: <199512151829.KAA13449@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sat, 9 Dec 1995, Joel McNamara wrote:
> One system administrator said the problem would have a greater effect on
> less-secure environments, such as universities and other institutions,
> than on corporations.
I didn't quite understand the "corporate speak" here. It sounds like
something coming from Bosnia or something. It's Greek to me.
What would make a University less secure than a corporation??
Universities (at least the ones, I've checked) have entire departments
and theoreticians devoted to Computers ... companies usually don't.
I'd think that Universities are much, much more secure environments than
corporations are. Doesn't Microsoft know this?? Or is this unique to
Seattle??
Alice de 'nonymous ... <an455120@anon.penet.fi>
...just another one of those...
P.S. This post is in the public domain.
C. S. U. M. O. C. L. U. N. E.
Return to December 1995
Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”