1996-05-23 - Re: The Crisis with Remailers
Header Data
From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: bruce@aracnet.com
Message Hash: 6c7fce5813157550937c5840ba558c01b69d858b6c773b3e49d82b0bc9724489
Message ID: <01I50KKMD21Q8Y4X9G@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-23 03:53:15 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 11:53:15 +0800
Raw message
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 11:53:15 +0800
To: bruce@aracnet.com
Subject: Re: The Crisis with Remailers
Message-ID: <01I50KKMD21Q8Y4X9G@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"bruce@aracnet.com" "Bruce Baugh" 22-MAY-1996 17:00:33.67
>Pointing people at legitimate uses of anonymity, as various folks have
>suggested, is undoubtedly a good idea. Would anyone care to suggest a few
>newsgroups where the vast majority of anonymous posts have really good
>reasons for being so?
While it isn't usage of true cypherpunk remailers, the sexual abuse
survivors newsgroup(s) would appear to be a place to start. Some of the groups
discussing human rights cases are also a possibility, as is
alt.religion.scientology.
-Allen
Thread
Return to May 1996
- Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”
- 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 11:53:15 +0800) - Re: The Crisis with Remailers - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 17:57:47 +0800) - Re: The Crisis with Remailers - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>