1996-04-28 - RE: Mindshare and Java

Header Data

From: Blake Coverett <blake@bcdev.com>
To: “‘Rich Graves’” <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Message Hash: 4502e989644af9632d483ad6c8016b65fa5629d02cd04f158023618650756044
Message ID: <01BB34A1.56D52990@bcdev.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-28 10:28:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 18:28:49 +0800

Raw message

From: Blake Coverett <blake@bcdev.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 18:28:49 +0800
To: "'Rich Graves'" <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Subject: RE: Mindshare and Java
Message-ID: <01BB34A1.56D52990@bcdev.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> "Trust" really isn't the right word for what I'm getting at. Microsoft's
> digital signature initiative is basically FUD with the spin "Only stuff
> signed or endorsed by Microsoft is going to work," but I don't think that
> this spin is inherent in signed code initiatives generally.

At the risk of being rude... I you had actually looked at the system in 
question you'd realize that your statements above are sheer nonsense.

-Blake (who posted a summary of the WinTrust stuff some weeks back)






Thread