1996-01-13 - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
Header Data
From: Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
To: N/A
Message Hash: aff7e14d7e6c81b170d45497587d3bd25cd3840b76d0e68f7136774045b530a8
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960112020051.6769E-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <199601030407.UAA12551@comsec.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-13 02:52:41 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 12 Jan 96 18:52:41 PST
Raw message
From: Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 96 18:52:41 PST
Subject: Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
In-Reply-To: <199601030407.UAA12551@comsec.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960112020051.6769E-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
An easy short-term partial solution would be to modify mailcrypt, bap, or
whatever front end you use to automatically put the current date and (a
shortened form of) the To: or Newsgroups: header into the PGP signature
Comments: line.
-rich
Thread
Return to January 1996
- Return to “ckey2@eng.ua.edu (Christopher R. Key)”
- Return to “david@sternlight.com (David Sternlight)”
- Return to “David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>”
- Return to “dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)”
- Return to “galactus@stack.urc.tue.nl (Arnoud “Galactus” Engelfriet)”
- Return to “Guy Geens <ggeens@elis.rug.ac.be>”
- Return to “Jeffrey Goldberg <cc047@Cranfield.ac.uk>”
- Return to “Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>”
- Return to “mdeindl@vnet.ibm.com ((Michael Deindl))”
- Return to “Philippe VIJGHEN <phv@bim.be>”
Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>”
- 1996-01-03 (Wed, 3 Jan 1996 21:09:58 +0800) - A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
- 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 05:26:59 +0800) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - david@sternlight.com (David Sternlight)
- 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 15:04:45 PST) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - Philippe VIJGHEN <phv@bim.be>
- 1996-01-11 (Thu, 11 Jan 96 09:18:32 PST) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - Jeffrey Goldberg <cc047@Cranfield.ac.uk>
- 1996-01-13 (Fri, 12 Jan 96 18:52:41 PST) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
- 1996-01-13 (Fri, 12 Jan 96 18:52:51 PST) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - Guy Geens <ggeens@elis.rug.ac.be>
- 1996-01-13 (Sun, 14 Jan 1996 03:46:30 +0800) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
- 1996-01-14 (Sun, 14 Jan 96 13:49:19 PST) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - galactus@stack.urc.tue.nl (Arnoud “Galactus” Engelfriet)
- 1996-01-16 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 04:10:39 +0800) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - ckey2@eng.ua.edu (Christopher R. Key)
- 1996-01-17 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 08:52:07 +0800) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
- 1996-01-18 (Thu, 18 Jan 1996 15:05:40 +0800) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - mdeindl@vnet.ibm.com ((Michael Deindl))