1996-03-29 - RE: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign langua

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 2fd5b7dcf8ba5601057737349c945205aab107c31abc963a020e75b7def22099
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.92.960328102645.25073B-100000@elaine42.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <01BB1C93.A8A24E40@jbugden.alis.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-29 11:44:33 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 19:44:33 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 19:44:33 +0800
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign langua
In-Reply-To: <01BB1C93.A8A24E40@jbugden.alis.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.92.960328102645.25073B-100000@elaine42.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 28 Mar 1996, James Bugden wrote:

> At Thursday, March 28, 1996 12:32 AM, Timothy C. May wrote:
> >My point is not against the learning of a foreign language, just that
> >economic considerations _must_ play a role.
>
> Q: What do you call an American company that ported its internet software
> to 22 different langauges in order to compete in the world?
>
> A: Microsoft

BWAHAHAHA!!! That's a good one. Did you hear the one about the SMB
security patch affecting *two* files that was released in English on
October 20th, and for other major western languages in mid-January?

-rich






Thread