From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 14:21:58 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Netscape
In-Reply-To: <199607191626.SAA09380@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.94.960719164240.14972B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Fri, 19 Jul 1996, Anonymous wrote:

[on hacktic]
> netscape-fts2-hp10.tar.gz	Fast Track Server 2.0 for HPUX10
> netscape-fts2-nt.exe		Fast Track Server 2.0 for WinNT
> netscape-hpus-30b5.tar.gz	Navigator 3.0b5 for HP-UX
> netscape-linux-30b5.tar.gz	Navigator 3.0b5 for Linux
> netscape-ssl30-src.tar.gz	SSL 3.0 source code
> netscape32us-30b5.exe		Navigator 3.0b5 for Win95/NT

And thus it begins... I think it's a bad idea to provoke the TLAs like this,
but I suppose it's inevitable. (But doesn't anyone use Macs or Suns?)

Fight for the spin: "Since Netscape isn't allowed to sell its software
overseas, people are going to pirate it, thereby losing the US o' A both
technology and money." 

> By the way, is it possible to get a certificate for the
> Fast Track 128 bit servers outside of north america?

Why would you want one when the source for Apache-SSL is available? Besides,
it's a Serious Copyright Violation, said with minimal irony. This whole
thing isn't Netscape's fault; in fact, they're doing their best to be the
good guys. 

- -rich

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQBVAwUBMfAfZZNcNyVVy0jxAQGCgQH9EH+19if1GlnbPW/RwRmMEC3N9lUnVb3v
EfDcMAyRa2xA9ud9JLmChVio9McBkE/8Hkvj0dj6IOpnVni+GjoX8Q==
=88i4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----