From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: d1cb26de4ff895d09520cf96403e206156da6ea04df9de8ce89960d6721c771f
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.970518012233.9969D-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-18 08:49:39 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 18 May 1997 16:49:39 +0800
From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Sun, 18 May 1997 16:49:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: dhp.com is blocked by CyberSitter
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.970518012233.9969D-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Um...
Who worth talking to isn't?
I have repeatedly requested that they block comp.os.ms-windows.announce and
stanford.edu because we allow content they might find objectionable, but
Milburn has REFUSED to do so. "We don't block sites just because some guy
say so." He's bouncing all subsequent requet from me to block my own web
site to my postmaster, i.e., me.
I still think a counter-blocking approach is appropriate. If you run a
popular web site, make it inaccessible to CyberSitter users. It's easy:
<META NAME="Voluntary Content Rating" CONTENT="adult">
CyberSitter is the only program that understands "the VCR standard."
-rich
http://www.stanford.edu/~llurch/
Return to May 1997
Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”
1997-05-18 (Sun, 18 May 1997 16:49:39 +0800) - Re: dhp.com is blocked by CyberSitter - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>