From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: Damaged Justice <frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
Message Hash: 7ae1925988b5005d4a354fd2c5b138b3db2b900f0a2792a89c172bbf272e4daf
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951106203817.19364A-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <199511062222.RAA14762@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-07 06:19:28 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 14:19:28 +0800
From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 14:19:28 +0800
To: Damaged Justice <frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
Subject: Re: DejaNews all over again
In-Reply-To: <199511062222.RAA14762@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951106203817.19364A-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 6 Nov 1995, Damaged Justice wrote:
> My two cents: I've used Dejanews for almost a month now, and have been
> consistently impressed with the results. The uses are many; the danger,
> as others have noted, is that people forget (or never realize in the
> first place) that you should never post anything to Usenet that you
> wouldn't want to see plastered on the evening news.
>
> Having said that, I'm greatly looking forward to the impending addition
> of the alt.* groups to their archives. Everyone is indeed a Kibo now,
> and the general public has become more aware of the need for reputations
> as a result.
I absitively agree. I have no quarrel with archiving and redistributing
public information. I think it's great.
Might also help spread aewareness of the anonymity options available. It
would be good to see if the dejanews folks would give the anon servers a
plug. Anybody friendly with them?
-rich
Return to November 1995
Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”