From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f694206a1c3bcc7051788209026fee583c7fd26c5c55b90295a66c0cc30f55b4
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960501143905.8180B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-02 04:44:11 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 12:44:11 +0800
From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 12:44:11 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: A survey on online privacy to skew[er] (WhoWhere?)
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960501143905.8180B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
http://www.whowhere.com/survey.html
The "Stanford" in the title is obviously just a typo. Be aware that
they've been known to aggressively finger, etc. sites that contact their
site.
I especially like this question, which I swear I am not making up:
30. Search by Affiliation - for example "Working Women", "Lawyers", "Gay
and Lesbian", "Hispanics", etc. [Must add] [Nice to add] [Don't care]
WhoWhere originally built their database by writing a script to
aggressively extract email addresses from the web server of OKRA, a
research computer at UC Riverside that had been culling addresses from
Usenet and other sources, making them freely available to the Internet
community. Two wrongs don't make a right, of course. OKRA has since taken
steps to ensure that noone else can extract mass quantities of addresses
in the same way.
-rich
Return to May 1996
Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”
1996-05-02 (Thu, 2 May 1996 12:44:11 +0800) - A survey on online privacy to skew[er] (WhoWhere?) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>