1996-04-18 - Re: Clinton blathering about Internet

Header Data

From: Tom Cooper <tcooper@wwa.com>
To: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Message Hash: f86d8c9672101ecaf263571a0917f5d36bba29cf681d7e73d4d151eb3c4294c8
Message ID: <Pine.BSD.3.92.960418093626.2368O-100000@sashimi.wwa.com>
Reply To: <Pine.ULT.3.92.960417101323.29708C-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-18 18:32:13 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 02:32:13 +0800

Raw message

From: Tom Cooper <tcooper@wwa.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 02:32:13 +0800
To: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Clinton blathering about Internet
In-Reply-To: <Pine.ULT.3.92.960417101323.29708C-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSD.3.92.960418093626.2368O-100000@sashimi.wwa.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>
> To be fair, I don't see any blathering, just "expressions of concern." The
> blathering quote comes from the SPLC, not Clinton.
>
Get real dude. Of course it's blathering. Either he really is that stupid
or he's trying to appeal to people's ignorant fears about the Net as some
sort of Satanic gathering place, just to get reelected.

Personally, I think that his intelligence is way over rated. He's turning
out to be just another hillbilly redneck in the White House. First
Clipper, then censorship, now fear mongering. I can't believe that a
former pot smoking, philandering, draft dodger could be such a dupe. Or is
it dope.
>
> Clinton, though, is pushing the unconstitutional "anti-terrorism"  bill,
> which is all blather, and worse, he's letting the Republicans add an
> unrelated rider that emasculates habeus corpus.
>
> -rich
>
>
Letting the Republicans? Clinton's on their side all the way.






Thread