From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c452a63e69f655ebf8b55b6347e0be5eb3f7a8eaa17746770283b7dc5bc1c80e
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.960726014021.5999C-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <v01510101ae1dd364c4f2@[204.62.128.229]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-26 12:20:10 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 20:20:10 +0800
From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 20:20:10 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Princeton University muzzles students
In-Reply-To: <v01510101ae1dd364c4f2@[204.62.128.229]>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.960726014021.5999C-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 25 Jul 1996, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> When Princeton administrators claimed they followed the letter of the
> law, in truth they used the law as an excuse to muzzle their students.
This instrumentalist conspiracy theory is a bit of a leap beyond the facts.
They were spammed. The content of the spam was political. They responded
quite stupidly. There is no evidence that they were looking for "an excuse
to muzzle their students."
They should "clarify" the policy, which everyone who would be expected to
enforce it opposes, within two weeks. Commercial speech might take longer.
- -rich
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQBVAwUBMfiFyJNcNyVVy0jxAQGznwIAkC50QnSfsuGZ+cylFBgDK/ibL136O6eW
LgXRVdCx4ZE2QERgq54O1FOWkvRdLfoXqVpr1Eai65z2wY117bBH6w==
=4XWE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to July 1996
Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”