From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 335a2fb99501be19f16ff136261319cf7d91ccc0dc839a75456bb23eee1cae09
Message ID: <199512202117.QAA28656@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199512202018.UAA02824@pangaea.ang.ecafe.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-20 21:18:16 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Dec 95 13:18:16 PST
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 95 13:18:16 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
In-Reply-To: <199512202018.UAA02824@pangaea.ang.ecafe.org>
Message-ID: <199512202117.QAA28656@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
ECafe Anonymous Remailer writes:
> I'm not trying to start a flame war.
Really?
> They aren't cypherpunks.
>
> Neither has come out against GAK.
You obviously have never spoken to Matt.
> Blaze even does "research" on GAK.
No, he does research on private escrow. Thats not the same thing as
GAK. Private escrow is sensible -- you don't want just one person with
the keys to, say, the personel records. What happens if they get hit
by a car?
> DO THEY HAVE YOU ALL SO IMPRESSED WITH THEIR MASTERS DEGREES THAT
> YOUR AFRAID TO LOOK CLOSELY?
Actually, Matt has a Ph.D. from Princeton.
> WHY IS EVERYONE SO QUICK TO DEFEND THESE PEOPLE?
Maybe I defend Matt because I think I know him pretty well -- we met
when he showed up at the Columbia U. computer science department in
the mid 1980s, and among other things we shared an office at Bellcore
for a year or two, and he's about as cryptography and privacy friendly
a person as you can find.
Maybe I defend him because you are likely an idiot who's never so much
as chatted with him.
Maybe I'm bored.
Who knows.
Perry
Return to December 1995
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”