1996-01-31 - Re: Downsizing the NSA

Header Data

From: Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 8740694fff9c4a09dc6d8a97a6bcdd29387f7a2eeefe16accd2ff2887f0de901
Message ID: <199601291503.JAA19908@softserv.tcst.com>
Reply To: <ad3075d502021004640c@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-31 19:39:11 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 03:39:11 +0800

Raw message

From: Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 03:39:11 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Downsizing the NSA
In-Reply-To: <ad3075d502021004640c@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <199601291503.JAA19908@softserv.tcst.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Timothy C. May writes:

>AT&T is downsizing, IBM downsized a while back, so why couldn't the NSA
>just do the right thing: admit that the Soviet threat is no more,
>congratulate the victors, and downsize by 20,000 employees?

They have been downsizing for almost 4 years now. Not just people, but
budget and mission priorities too. I would imagine they are smaller now
than they were in 1980.

Thread

• Return to January 1996

• Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”
• Return to “futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)”
• Return to “Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>”

• Return to “tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)”

• 1996-01-28 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 16:58:16 +0800) - Downsizing the NSA - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1996-01-28 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 18:23:28 +0800) - Re: Downsizing the NSA - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
    • 1996-01-29 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 15:51:28 +0800) - Re: Downsizing the NSA - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      • 1996-01-29 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 05:35:33 +0800) - Re: Downsizing the NSA - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
  • 1996-01-31 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 03:39:11 +0800) - Re: Downsizing the NSA - Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>