From: cjs@netcom.com (cjs)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5f502ac909631203d57d9b8b2f349d6f113323981360cc6275cf452c991dada9
Message ID: <199511011930.LAA28734@netcom20.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199511011907.OAA16631@opine.cs.umass.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-02 02:59:04 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 10:59:04 +0800
From: cjs@netcom.com (cjs)
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 10:59:04 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [FRED] Anonymity and Integrity
In-Reply-To: <199511011907.OAA16631@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Message-ID: <199511011930.LAA28734@netcom20.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> My turn to rise to the bait...
>
> Dr. Frederick B. Cohen writes:
> > I have been thinking about the issues of anonymity for some time, and I
> > have been convinced for some time that you can't have both integrity and
> > anonymity.
>
> What's your working definition of "integrity" in this context ?
Come on.. we're never gonna get Dr. Fred to go away if we keep giving
him attention.
Christopher
Return to November 1995
Return to “shields@tembel.org (Michael Shields)”