1995-11-02 - Re: [FRED] Anonymity and Integrity

Header Data

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: 4b14fcbbd6f3832041d433f3006babdec53a2992149d6338ba8701182ed6e9eb
Message ID: <199511011907.OAA16631@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <9511011022.AA08641@all.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-02 01:44:50 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 09:44:50 +0800

Raw message

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 09:44:50 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: [FRED] Anonymity and Integrity
In-Reply-To: <9511011022.AA08641@all.net>
Message-ID: <199511011907.OAA16631@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


My turn to rise to the bait...

Dr. Frederick B. Cohen writes:
> I have been thinking about the issues of anonymity for some time, and I
> have been convinced for some time that you can't have both integrity and
> anonymity.  

What's your working definition of "integrity" in this context ?

-Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>
"Once anonymous, twice pseudonymous"





Thread