1996-01-31 - Re: Lotus Notes
Header Data
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: e744ba6ccb40c671fc14afcf292ba6620530468b7268485c2070a68187b4fcef
Message ID: <199601310315.WAA26299@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <9601310246.AA14482@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-31 14:36:06 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 22:36:06 +0800
Raw message
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 22:36:06 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Lotus Notes
In-Reply-To: <9601310246.AA14482@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199601310315.WAA26299@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
bal quoted from the RSAREF 2.0 license:
> /* RSA key lengths.
> */
> #define MIN_RSA_MODULUS_BITS 508
> #define MAX_RSA_MODULUS_BITS 1024
> #define MAX_RSA_MODULUS_LEN ((MAX_RSA_MODULUS_BITS + 7) / 8)
> #define MAX_RSA_PRIME_BITS ((MAX_RSA_MODULUS_BITS + 1) / 2)
> #define MAX_RSA_PRIME_LEN ((MAX_RSA_PRIME_BITS + 7) / 8)
Unfortunately this still doesn't explain Charlie Kaufman's comment
(paraphrased) that the "crypto software also limited us to 760 bit RSA keys".
Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>
Thread
Return to January 1996
- Return to ““Brian A. LaMacchia” <bal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>”
- Return to “futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)”
Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”
- 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 23:31:06 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
- 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 22:38:27 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - “Brian A. LaMacchia” <bal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
- 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 22:36:06 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
- 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 22:38:27 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - “Brian A. LaMacchia” <bal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>